Use case · Design
Delegate the bounded block. Keep the architecture.
Circuitly proposes mid-complexity circuit blocks — a buck rail, a CAN transceiver, a sensor front-end — as native schematic work you inspect as a diff. This page is the working scenario; the generation capability itself is described under AI schematic generation.
The problem
Mid-complexity blocks are structured, well-documented, and repetitive — and they still consume senior engineering time, because delegating them means writing down everything you know about the design. The real risk in a delegated block is never the topology; it's the unstated assumption that was obvious to the person who didn't write it down.
Connected workflow
Circuitly works from your requirement, your approved library, and the datasheets of the parts it proposes — inside the same harness that reviews the rest of the design. The proposal arrives as a diff with its assumptions written down, so the inspection starts where the risk actually lives.
Define
The requirement, the interfaces, the approved parts, and what must not change.
Propose
Native schematic work grounded in your library and the datasheets.
Inspect
A diff with the assumptions written down, ready to interrogate.
Accept
The engineer owns the architecture and decides what merges.
Design output
- A 3V3/2A buck stage proposed from
power-spec.md, using approved-library parts - The FB divider derived from the datasheet equation, with resistor tolerance stated
- Decoupling placed per the MCU's per-pin guidance, not a blanket 100 nF habit
- An assumptions list — "assumed 12 V nominal input per REQ-PWR-01" — attached to the diff
Engineer decision
The engineer owns the architecture. Circuitly proposes the block and shows its work; what merges into the design is decided in review, the same way you'd treat work from any contributor.
Pick the block your team is tired of redrawing.
We’ll map the requirement, the library, the boundaries, and the review your engineers keep.